The use of wetting agent in suspension

DEVELOPMENT OF PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS 1(NFNF2213) LAB REPORT

Lecturer’s Name : Associate Professor Dr. Haliza Katas

Group members:

  1. Aisyah Nuha binti Mohd Sor (A172179)
  2. Nur llyana binti Jamali (A168237)
  3. Arifah Bt Abdul Razak (A168784)
  4. Nur Anis Sofiah binti M Rahim (A171660)
  5. Mohammad Jundullah bin Morni (A167616)

SEMESTER 1, SESSION 2019/2020

Introduction

   Suspension is a heterogeneous mixture that has two phases. It consists of insoluble solid particles that mixed together with a liquid medium. Insoluble particles are called by dispersed or internal phase while liquid medium is a continuous or external phase. Suspension is an important class for pharmaceutical dosage form, especially for drugs that are insoluble in other dosage form.

  The advantages of suspension are it have effective dispensing of hydrophobic drugs, it can mask the unpleasant taste of certain ingredients and it also offers resistance of degradation of drugs due to hydrolysis, oxidation or microbial activity. It chemically more stable than in a solution. However, suspension tend to settle over time leading to lack of uniformity of dose. It is also difficult to achieve uniform and accurate dose unless it packs in dosage form.

   In this experiment, we try not to eliminate to separation but rather to decrease the rate of settling. Therefore, the suspended particles should not settle rapidly and resulting the sediment. The suspension must be easily re-suspended by shaking the suspension before use. By using wetting agents like tragacanth it can help to reduce the surface tension in the sedimentation.

Objective

To investigate the effect of different amounts of Tragacanth on the sedimentation rates of suspensions as wetting agents.

Materials

Chalk

Tragacanth

Concentrated Peppermint Water 

Double Strength Chloroform Water

Distilled Water

Syrup BP

Apparatus 

1 x 1 mL graduated pipette 

1 x Pipette bulb

1 x Weighing boat

1 x Set of Mortar and Pestle 

4 x 200 mL graduated cylinder

4 x 100 mL beaker

1 x Weighing balance

1 x Viscometer

Procedure 

1.       A suspension of Pediatric Chalk Mixture (150 mL) was prepared according to the following formula:

2.      5 mL of the suspension was poured into a weighing boat and each formulation was labelled. The texture, clarity and color of each suspension was observed and compared.

3.       The sedimentation rate of each suspension was determined.  The suspension was shaken vigorously so that all of the particles are uniformly suspended, and the time was taken. The boundary between the sediment and the supernatant was observed and the time it takes for the boundary to pass each 10 mL graduation until the volume of sediment has reached 80 mL was recorded.

**The best way to observe the boundary is to view it directly in front of a light source. You might try viewing it with sunlight from the windows as your light source. You should note whether there is a clear and distinct boundary or no obvious boundary.

4.       The graduated cylinder was set down on the lab bench, and the lab timer started at this point.

5.       For suspensions A to D, the sedimentation volume of the suspensions at t=0, 2, 5, 10, 15, and 30 min were recorded.

6.       The sedimentation volume ratio was calculated using the following formula:

Sedimentation volume ratio = Hu/Ho

Hu: ultimate height of the sediment, i.e., the height of the sediment at a particular time

Ho: initial height of the total suspension

8.       The ease of re-dispersibility of each formulation were examined by:

i)  The Parafilm® was snugged on the mouth of the graduated cylinder, and the seal was re-enforce the with gloved hand.

ii) The number of inversions it takes to completely re-disperse the drug was recorded.

iii) The observation was recorded.

9.       95 mL of suspension was poured into a 100 mL beaker and the viscosity of the suspension was determined using viscometer at 12 000 rpm for 2 min. The data was recorded. 

11.   Each suspension was poured into a plastic bottle. After storing all the suspensions for a period of 4 days, the ease of redispersion in each system and which system is most acceptable was determined.

Results 

Table 1 – The comparison of texture, clarity and color of each suspension.

Table 2 – The boundary between sediment and supernatant and its time taken to pass each 10 ml graduation.

Table 3 – The sedimentation volume at pre-determined time.

Table 4 – Calculation of sedimentation volume ratio.

Sedimentation volume ratio = Hu/Ho

Hu : ultimate height of the sediment (the height of the sediment at a particular time)

Ho : initial height of the total suspension (150ml)

Table 5 – The ease of re-dispersibility of each formulation.

Table 6 – The viscosity, mean and standard deviation of each suspension.

Discussion 

  1. Compare and discuss physical appearances of all the suspensions produced.

Suspension B is less viscous compared to suspension C but more viscous than suspension A. This is due to the presence of Tragacanth powder in Suspension B is less compared to in suspension C while in suspension A there is absence of Tragacanth powder. Tragacanth powder acts as a viscous factor when it poured into the suspension. Tragacanth is in the form of powder so it help more to produce viscous suspension.

Suspension A has the fastest rate of sedimentation compared to suspension B and C. This is due to the presence of wetting agents which is Tragacanth powder that slows the sedimentation of chalk in the suspension. This will help to lower the interfacial surface tension in the suspension and allows the contact of solid particles and liquid vehicles. Suspension C has the slowest rate of sedimentation where it takes longer time to sediment compared to suspension A and B. Suspension B is difficult to sediment compared to suspension A. Tragacanth powder in suspension B and C will slow sedimentation. Suspension D did not sediment because there is no presence of Tragacanth powder.

The colour of the suspension A B and C are white and cloudy due to the presence of chalk powder. However, suspension D have clear solution due to the absence of chalk powder.

  1. Plot Hu/Ho vs. time for each of the suspensions (Table 1) and discuss the findings.

Those three suspensions give the same exponential trendline. This means all of the suspensions have the same sedimentation rate. High concentration of tragacanth is supposed to have less sedimentation rate. In this experiment, the graph tells us that the differences between weight of tragacanth uses is not significant to give an effect on sedimentation rate. This is because the solid particles in this experiment have a very high density and also gravitational force to against the adhesive and adherence force caused by suspending agent. Therefore in further, tragacanth need to triturate firmly to reduce the particle size therefore they easily dispersed in the suspension. There is no graph for suspension D as there is no solid matter in that preparation.

  1. Briefly explain the principle of analysis using viscometer. Plot the viscosity vs. Tragacanth content (Table 2) and discuss the findings.

Viscometer is an instrument that measures the viscosity of fluid. Firstly, we need to know what is viscosity measured for. The substance’s resistance to motion under an applied force is what the viscosity measurement tell us (CSC Scientific Company, n.d). Therefore, viscometer work by getting the measurement of the resistance force that act upon the spinning spindle of the viscometer. Hence, high viscosity measurement means the spindle having a low torque (frequency become slower) or having a higher resistance. Unit of viscosity is milipascal second which mean a milipascal of force is act to move one layer of fluid in one layer to another in a second.

Based on the graph, we can say that viscosity of fluid is perpendicular to tragacanth content. The higher the tragacanth, the higher the viscosity of the fluid. Suspension without tragacanth or other suspending agent and only have syrup as a viscous media will only have viscosity around 0.8 cP and even lower without syrup.

  1. After storing the suspensions for a period of 4 days, determine the ease of redispersion of each. 
SuspensionThe ease of redispersion of each
AQuite Easy
BQuite Hard
CThe most Hardest
DThe most easiest
  1. Based on all of the observations, which product would be considered to be most acceptable? Explain.

Based on the results obtained, Suspension B would be considered to be the most acceptable. This is because suspension B has 0.3 g of tragacanth, which allow the chalk to be dispersed evenly for a period of time that is sufficient for pouring. This is very important to allow the correct dosage to be administered. Next, suspension B also has ideal viscosity which only need 6 times of inversion to allow the suspension to fully redispersed. Again, this is important to allow the administration of the correct active pharmaceutical ingredient to achieve the optimum therapeutic effect.

  1. Briefly explain the function of each excipient used in the suspension formulation. Explain the influence of tragacanth on the physical characteristics and stability of suspension. 
Ingredients Function 
TragacanthSuspending agent to suspend the chalk in the suspension
Concentrated peppermint water and syrup BPFor flavouring agent to increase the patience acceptance 
Double strength chloroform waterFor preservatives to prevent microbial growth 

Tragacanth are used as a wetting agent and by making it more viscous, they affect the physical characteristics of the suspension. Tragacanth act as wetting agents in which film around particles is formed and surface tension is reduced. Thus, in the liquid media, the insoluble chalk was suspended. The more tragacanth content, the more uniform the chalk in the liquid is dispersed, making it more viscous. High viscosity will reduce the rate of sedimentation and increase the stability of the suspension in longer period of time.

Conclusion 

In conclusion, tragacanth is used as a wetting agent to reduce the surface tension of a liquid to allow it to be spread easily. Tragacanth influence the rate of sedimentation and the viscosity of the suspension. The ideal amount of tragacanth should be used as the suspension to allow correct dosage to be administered and to allow redispersion of the active ingredient after storage.

References

  1. CSC Scientific Company, Inc. (n.d.). Viscosity testing : testing the flow properties of liquid products. Retrieved from https://www.cscscientific.com/viscosity
  2. Vinensia (2013). Formulation. Retrieved from http://formulation.vinensia.com/2011/12/wetting-agents-for-suspensions.html?m=1
  3. Colony Gums Hydrocolloid & Stabilizer Systems : Tragacanth. Retrieved from https://colonygums.com/tragacanth/

DEVELOPMENT OF PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS 1 (NFNF2213) LABORATORY REPORT

SEMESTER 1, SESSION 2019/2020

Practical 2

Lecturer’s Name : Associate Professor Dr. Ng Shiow Fern

Group members:

  1. Aisyah Nuha binti Mohd Sor (A172179)
  2. Nur llyana binti Jamali (A168237)
  3. Arifah Bt Abdul Razak (A168784)
  4. Nur Anis Sofiah binti M Rahim (A171660)
  5. Mohammad Jundullah bin Morni (A167616)

Practical 2: Characterisation of Emulsion Formulations

Introduction

Emulsion is a two-phase system that is not thermodynamically stable. This contains at least 2 non-miscible liquids (internal / dispersed phase) homogeneously dispersed in another liquid (external / continuous phase). Emulsions can be categorized into two types: oil in water emulsion (o / w) and water in oil emulsion (w/o). Emulsion can be stabilised by the addition of emulsifying agent. The HLB (hydrophilic-lipophilic balance) method is used to determine the amount and type of surfactant needed to prepare a stable emulsion. A combination of 2 emulsifying agent is typically used to create a more stable emulsion. HLB value for combination emulsifying agent can be calculated by using the following formula:

Objective 

To determine:

1. The effects of HLB surfactant on the stability of the emulsion.

2. The effects of different oil phases used in the formulation on the physical characteristics and stability of the emulsion.

Materials

Arachis Oil

Distilled water

Span 20

Tween 80

Sudan III solution (0.5%)

Apparatus 

8 Test tubes

1 50 ml measuring cylinder

1 50 ml beaker

Plastic droppers

15 ml centrifugation tube

Vortex mixer

Hot plate stirrer and magnetic stirrer

Viscometer

Weighing boat

Light microscope

Marker pen for labelling

1 set of mortar and pestle

Water bath (45°C )

Refrigerator (4°C)

Centrifuge

Microscope slides and cover slips

Procedure 

1) Each test tube was labelled and marked 1 cm from the base of the test tube.

2)      4 ml of Arachis oil is mixed with 4 ml of distilled water into the test tube.

3)     Span 20 and Tween 80 were added into the mixture of oil and water using a plastic dropper. The closed test tube was mixed its content with vortex mixer for 45 seconds. The time needed for the interface to reach 1 cm is recorded. The HLB value is determined for the sample. Step 1 – 3 are repeated to obtain an average HLB value of a duplicate. 

Tube no12345678
Span 20 (drops)15121266300
Tween 80 (drops)36991518150

Table 2

(HLB span 20=8.6,HLB Tween 80= 15.0)

4)      A few drops of Sudan III solution are added to the most stable emulsion in table 2 in a weighing boat and was mixed homogeneously. The sample is spread on a microscope slide and is observed under the light microscope (Magnification 10x). The appearance of the emulsion formed is drawn and described. 

5)      A mineral oil emulsion (50g) was prepared from the formulation below by using wet gum method according to Table 3.

Table 3

Mineral oil20 ml
Acacia6.25 g
Syrup5 ml
Vanillin2 g
Alcohol3 ml
Distilled water qs.50 ml

6)      The emulsion was placed into 50 ml beaker and stirred for 2 minutes using a magnetic stirrer on a plate stirrer. 

7)      2g of emulsion was taken from the beaker and placed into a weighing boat and is labeled few drops of Sudan III solution are added and mixed together.

8)      The viscosity of the emulsion that was formed is determined after homogenization (15 g in 50 ml beaker) by using viscometer that is calibrated with “Spindle” type LV-4. The sample is exposed to 45 C ( water bath) for 10-15 minutes. Then, the sample is followed by with the 4 C (refrigerator) for another 10-15 minutes. The emulsion is allowed to reach room temperature (10-15 minutes). The viscosity of the emulsion is determined after temperature cycle in Table 4. This method was performed in triplicate.

9) 5 g of homogenised emulsion was placed into a centrifugation tube and centrifuged (4500 rpm,10 minutes , 25 C). The height of the separation formed is measured and the ratio of the height separation is determined. This method was performed in triplicate.

Results 

Group 9 

Tube No.12345678
Span 20(drops)15121266300
Tween 80 (drops)36991518150
Time taken for the interface to reach 1 cm (min)1.33 0.590.460.180.06

Group 10 

Tube No.12345678
Span 20(drops)15121266300
Tween 80 (drops)36991518150
Time taken for the interface to reach 1 cm (min)93.5037.3037.1238.2010.000.15

Group 11

Tube No.12345678
Span 20(drops)15121266300
Tween 80 (drops)36991518150
Time taken for the interface to reach 1 cm (min)52.4882.3224.1221.3119.0225.0834.5219.14

Group 12

Tube No.12345678
Span 20(drops)15121266300
Tween 80 (drops)36991518150A
Time taken for the interface to reach 1 cm (min)80.9072.7065.5046.334.100.13

Observation on the most stable emulsions

OilGroupObservation under light microscope (Magnification x10)AppearanceColour distribution
Palm Oil9More oil globules with uniform sizesColour is evenly distributed
Arachis Oil10More oil globules with non-uniform sizesColour is evenly distributed
Olive Oil11Oily emulsion formed and can be clearly seen.Evenly spread to small particles.
Mineral Oil12Uniform  size globules are observed Colour is evenly distributed

Table 4 

Mineral Oil (20ml)

Discussion

There are different observation in every emulsion that use different oil base. Palm oil emulsion have the most consistency in oil globule size. Olive oil and mineral oil have nearly consistent in their size of globules which the observation of mineral oil emulsion is not clear while olive oil does. Arachis oil have more oil globules but there is no uniformity in the size. Colour distribution in palm oil, arachis oil, and mineral oil emulsion is evenly distributed in their continuous phase. Only olive oil emulsion have the colour distribution in the small particle.

Tube 8 which contain none of tween 20 and tween 80 is the fastest to form 1 cm of interface. This occurs in all of oil base which only take less than 1 minutes for the interface to reach 1 cm. Most of the group have an invalid result for tube 1 and 2 except group 11 which using olive oil. This is because we do not have much time to record the data. This shows that tube 1 and tube 2 need more than 2 hours to show the result if there is no error in the procedure. Tube 1 and tube 2 consist drops of tween 20 that more than twice of tween 80. Therefore, combinations of those two surfactants will give us most stable emulsions. In all groups, we can see the pattern of the time against tweens. As the quantity of the tween 80 increase while the quantity of tween 20 decreased, the time taken for the interface to reach 1 cm is decrease.  

In stability test that involving temperature cycle, different volume of mineral oil is used which is 20 ml, 25ml, 30 ml and 35 ml. There is huge differences in viscosity when using 20 ml and 35 ml of mineral oil. This means using less or excessive oil will make the emulsion not stable. As the temperature cycle is done, both of them give the difference in viscosity with 49.96% and 58.15% which shown the emulsion purity cannot stand in low and high temperature. The most stable emulsion is the emulsion with 25 ml of mineral oil. The differences in viscosity after the temperature cycle is only 8.14%. Using 30 ml of mineral oil also give a low differences in viscosity after temperature cycle which is  9.83%. 

In separation phase experiment, we can see the pattern of the  separation ratio against volume of oil phase. The separation ratio is decreasing when the volume of oil was increasing until 30 ml. After 30 ml, the separation ratio is increased again as the quantity of sedimentation increase due to excessive oil used.

Conclusion

In conclusion, HLB surfactant give an effect to stability of emulsion. Hydrophilic-lipophilic balance value is the key to know how much the oil and water phase needed to make stable emulsions. Different oil phase also give a variant result in observation of the emulsions such as their physical characteristics and stability. When using a fixed quantity of emulsifying agent, the quantity of oil phase also need to be controls as the ratio of oil-water phase also the factor of the stability of the emulsion.

References

Davies, J. T. (1957). A quantitative kinetic theory of emulsion type. I. Physical chemistry of the emulsifying agent. In Gas/Liquid and Liquid/Liquid Interface. Proceedings of the International Congress of Surface Activity (Vol. 1, pp. 426-438).

Ibrahim, N., Raman, I. A., & Yusop, M. R. (2015). Effects of functional group of non-ionic surfactants on the stability of emulsion. Malaysian journal of analytical sciences, 19(1), 261-267.Mohamed, A. I., Sultan, A. S., Hussein, I. A., & Al-

Muntasheri, G. A. (2017). Influence of surfactant structure on the stability of water-in-oil emulsions under high-temperature high-salinity conditions. Journal of Chemistry, 2017.

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started